Comments on: Rails assumptions http://kbullock.ringworld.org/2008/11/13/rails-assumptions/ god, tech, and other geekery Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:16:02 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Kevin http://kbullock.ringworld.org/2008/11/13/rails-assumptions/comment-page-1/#comment-49 Kevin Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:02:00 +0000 /2008/12/01/rails-assumptions#comment-49 <p>I thought sqlite3 was only the default for development—when you move to production, you go MySQL. Or is that just me?</p> I thought sqlite3 was only the default for development—when you move to production, you go MySQL. Or is that just me?

]]> By: Michael Janssen http://kbullock.ringworld.org/2008/11/13/rails-assumptions/comment-page-1/#comment-48 Michael Janssen Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:02:00 +0000 /2008/12/01/rails-assumptions#comment-48 <p>Some of these are annoying (but only some).</p> <p>Lots of these are true, but they move quickly. For example, less than a year ago, the default assumption was subversion. It's only because git has the "web application" github that I think made it take off.</p> <p>Also, I think sqlite3 is default until you start having to "scale" - then it's MySQL.</p> Some of these are annoying (but only some).

Lots of these are true, but they move quickly. For example, less than a year ago, the default assumption was subversion. It’s only because git has the "web application" github that I think made it take off.

Also, I think sqlite3 is default until you start having to "scale" – then it’s MySQL.

]]>